With the RNC held in St. Paul, yet many parties and famous faces staying and partying in Minneapolis as well, the national media has had some trouble keeping our two cities straight. Everyone from Katie Couric to our own Michele Bachmann has misspoke/printed about where the convention is actually held. Here is just one more article from MinnPost that highlights the problem:
Minnesota Nice is quickly shoved aside if you call St. Paul Minneapolis, multiple reporters are observing. Daily Herald correspondent Randy Mink recalls St. Paul's initial yelps of neglect: "St. Paul boosters were annoyed when in 2006 a New York Times headline declared "GOP Picks Minneapolis as '08 Site of Convention."
Katie Couric paints a similar picture in a recent Digg.com message. "Don't say Minneapolis, 'cause they get really mad about that in St. Paul — trust me, I heard from them," she says.
While I know I may just be proving the point, I have to say it: These mistakes are most often being made by reporters. Reporters. Their job is to get the facts straight every time. As a fellow journalist, if this was my mistake, instead of laughing it off as sibling rivarly and sore egos, I'd be printing a retraction and apologizing for my lack of skills. Seriously, how hard is it to get it right, or at least learn the local lingo of "Minneapolis-St. Paul" or "Twin Cities"?
Maybe I'll keep a tally during the coverage next week as to how many reporters and talking heads get it wrong. Or, do you think once they get here and we're finally on the national stage, they'll finally understand geography?
[UPDATE 8-27-08: Two days down for the DNC and so far, so good. Both Brian Williams and Tom Brokaw used St. Paul and Twin Cities in sentences when referring to next week's events. Hillary even mentioned the Twin Cities in her speech last night - though it was conveniently used to paint a picture of the sameness ("twins") of McCain and Bush. Hey, it's a start.]
--Amanda Fretheim Gates
Mangaing Editor






Recent Comments